| Recent Posts | About the Author | Navigation |
|---|---|---|
|
|
David is an occasional blogger, software engineer, Nintendo fanboy, liberal, news magazine addict, voracious TiVo user, and bibliophile. He was born in St. Louis, grew up in southern Indiana, and returned to St. Louis to attend Washington University. He hasn't managed to escape yet. He's a fan of free wine tastings, too many tv shows to name, and eating out. David makes his living developing web applications used internally by his employer. He doesn't blog about work because he's heard too many stories about that causing workplace troubles. There's more on the about page. |
|
| Recent Comments | ||
|
|
||
| Recent Photos | ||
|
|
||
I have the worst luck with regarding other weblogs. When I add a link to a weblog onto my homepage (my version of bookmarking) I think some kind of mysterious signal is generated that tells the author of that particular site to never post again. And of course the real trump card is when I add a link from -273 to their site. I might as well hack into their site, delete all their files, and use their account to send spam to people. The end result would be the same: no more updates on that site.
I'm generalizing of course. The -273 is filled with links to lots of great sites, and I don't want their authors upset at me. But we also link to sites like this one.
All of this is building up to a point, I promise. Here's my idea. What if I replace the links to all of the good sites with links to bad sites? That way, all the sites I like will keep posting, and the sites I despise will disappear, never to be seen again. The main problem, at least as my sleep-deprived mind currently sees things, is that there are so many sites that I dislike that composing a list would be rather tedious. And taking down the links to the sites I like, while meant as a compliment, could be viewed as somewhat insulting.
Before the Internet, life was simpler, and no one had problems like these.
Posted by on 1 July 2002 at 10:03 PM


