| Recent Posts | About the Author | Navigation |
|---|---|---|
|
|
David is an occasional blogger, software engineer, Nintendo fanboy, liberal, news magazine addict, voracious TiVo user, and bibliophile. He was born in St. Louis, grew up in southern Indiana, and returned to St. Louis to attend Washington University. He hasn't managed to escape yet. He's a fan of free wine tastings, too many tv shows to name, and eating out. David makes his living developing web applications used internally by his employer. He doesn't blog about work because he's heard too many stories about that causing workplace troubles. There's more on the about page. |
|
| Recent Comments | ||
|
|
||
| Recent Photos | ||
|
|
||
27 February 2002 - 2:28 am
The following letter to the editor was printed in the current BusinessWeek. My comments follow the letter, but I must say now that the guy who wrote it is an idiot.
I'm sure Louis V. Gerstner Jr. did a good job during his time at IBM, but I'm curious about why he and his team did not exploit the business potential of Deep Blue's software, which in May, 1997, beat Gary Kasparov, the then-champion of international chess. For Deep Blue to have defeated Kasparov without qualification, IBM would had to have developed a class of software that would be capable of eliminating the need for bar codes—an acheivement that would be worth several trillion dollars a year to its owners in the initial years and untold amounts as time went on. If the Kasparov defeat was unqualified, and IBM failed to transfer this success to business software, is Palmisano going to set this situation right?Thomas Wulff
Stoughton, Mass.
A few points regarding this letter:
That last point bears repeating: Deep Blue has nothing to do with bar codes. It. . . has. . . absolutely. . . nothing. . . to. . . do. . . with. . . bar. . . codes.
I hope that there is some explanation, for example, the bulk of this guy's letter was removed by the BW editors, because as it stands he looks like an idiot.
Posted by on 27 February 2002 at 2:28 AM
Comments


